While the bulk of the work posted was yours, they used very similar adjectives and adverbs to describe you and your work. The Chief Happiness Officer uses “great little video” and “excellent blog.” Problogger asks for people to “help and support Stephen” and provides high accolades about your blog. They may not have said much, but they both described the same wonderful person.

By the way, I have subscribed to your blog and look forward to your posts.

What a fascinating, if not puzzling post you have here. First of all, thank you for “triangularing” the three of us together. I appreciate your wonderful compliments about my blog, Adversity University. I’m grateful that you find it a good source of inspiration for that is my intention and I hope I will continue to provide such information.

Can you help me understand what you were trying to postulate here?

Let me see if I understand you correctly. Tell me if I’m off the mark, okay? This makes for a fascinating case study and I’m your eager student.

You’re saying that the Chief Happiness Officer was trying to say the same thing Darren was saying in terms of making video posts more accessible? Is that accurate?

What happened was Darren gave me the opportunity to write a guest post at his blog about the subject matter so it wasn’t him who said anything about it - he just gave me space to make a case in the form of a guest post.

On the other hand, the Chief Happiness Officer merely posted a video of me talking about a most life changing moment, which was not subtitled because it came directly off YouTube. (My subtitled videos actually are made through Overstream, another site but somehow uses streaming YouTube videos - I have no idea how it works).

So help me here, my friend, what were you trying to say? I’m curious.

I look forward to hearing from you Neil.